Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/James D. Nicoll (2nd nomination)

We're getting jumped on by the SF community, of all things! Since the reliable sources are now actually coming to our door, I guess that means we can attribute this AFD? --Kim Bruning 15:47, 17 May 2007 (UTC)


 * It doesn't matter what community "jumps" on us Kim. When the hordes of webcomic fans drop by Wikipedia to support their favorite cartoonist, as they often do, we don't kowtow to them either.  The problem with this article is, and continues to be, reliable, non-trivial, third party sources.  Burntsauce 17:47, 17 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Um, yes, but now we have basically people considered experts in their field by any measure... stating that this gentleman is notable, literally, on the AFD. I'd (almost) go as far as to state that this AFD page itself now counts as a reliable source. Does that make sense? --Kim Bruning 18:38, 17 May 2007 (UTC)


 * It would make much more sense if we avoided self-references and just provided non-trivial sources within the actual article, don't you agree? Burntsauce 18:55, 17 May 2007 (UTC)


 *  --Kim Bruning 19:09, 17 May 2007 (UTC)