Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Jeffrey Epstein death conspiracy theories

Should a separate article be created for Epstein's death or should the conspiracy article be transitioned into one regarding his death(assuming it isn't deleted)? HAL 333  04:22, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Conspiracy theories about his death are not a subject separate and notable distinct from his death. It's not like he's going to have a state funeral. bd2412  T 12:12, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Actually they are two separate articles. Conspiracy theories should not be fully explored in a article covering someone's death. That is the current precedent. Although Death of Diana, Princess of Wales mentions conspiracies, there is a separate Death of Diana, Princess of Wales conspiracy theories. There are articles for Assassination of John F. Kennedy, Assassination of Yitzhak Rabin, Assassination of Robert F. Kennedy, Assassination of Martin Luther King Jr., but there are also and John F. Kennedy assassination conspiracy theories, Yitzhak Rabin assassination conspiracy theories, Robert F. Kennedy assassination conspiracy theories, Martin Luther King Jr. assassination conspiracy theories. While there is a page for the 1943 Gibraltar B-24 crash, there is also one for Władysław Sikorski's death controversy. I could go on even more. There is enough (and will be much more) information on Epstein's death to support a death page and a conspiracies page. I don't think conspiracies belong on a death article, but on their own article, which is why I have created Death of Jeffery Epstein. Cheers HAL  333  19:20, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Heads of state and national heroes? Jeffrey Epstein is not on par with any of those figures. bd2412  T 03:06, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Sure, Epstein is not as respectable as any of those listed, but that is not to say that he isn't notable. Ask anyone off the street who Władysław Sikorski is and they wouldn't have a clue, but many would be familiar with Epstein. This seems to be supported by the fact that Epstein's page is twice as large (in terms of bytes) as Sikorski's. Just because he's not a world leader doesn't mean he's not significant. I hope you realize that wikipedia is filled with conspiracy theory articles of far less significance, but yet still exist like RMS Titanic conspiracy theories (which I find ridiculous myself). Why don't you go freak out about those articles as well. HAL  333  04:38, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

Epstein
Hello Scott, what are your reasons for believing that this article should be deleted? Andersonnnnnnnn (talk) 15:24, 13 August 2019 (UTC)