Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Jerec

Closing administrator's decision rationale
If you choose to add comments to this page, please do so in a new section below, do not inturrupt my comments here.

Raw count analysis

 * Delete
 * 1) EEMIV (6 edits)
 * 2) Jobjörn
 * 3) Doctorfluffy
 * 4) Gavin.collins
 * 5) Dorftrottel


 * Keep
 * 1) RC-0722 (2 edits)
 * 2) Dark Kyle
 * 3) Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles (5 edits)


 * Non-participatory
 * 1) The wub (2 edits) - delsort

Valid delete arguments

 * notability is not established per WP:FICT
 * No assertion of real-world context
 * no secondary sources
 * Not the subject of multiple, non-trivial published works from sources that are reliable and independent of the subject
 * Fails WP:NOT

Invalid delete arguments

 * previously redirected but reverted by author

Valid keep arguments

 * search engine results demonstrated real-world context
 * (many top results were disputed)
 * sources should be available for most star wars topics

Invalid keep arguments

 * WP:ILIKEIT
 * external links can be used as inline citations
 * they do not satisfy WP:RS
 * inherits notability from work of fiction in which it appears
 * WP:5 pillars allows keeping to improve
 * if notable
 * article is organized well
 * the article contains factual information
 * WP:WAX
 * WP:OSE
 * WP:INEEDIT
 * very important in its fictional universe

Summary
By count and strength of argument this debate is closed as Delete. JERRY talk contribs 02:44, 4 February 2008 (UTC)