Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Jerry Frankel

Refactoring of others' comments
I assume the refactoring of my comment to place it elsewhere was not meant negatively, but I prefer my comment not to be refactored and I restored it to original location. I hope that my objection to being refactored/moved will be respected.

In so doing i moved other's reply to my comment to go with my comment, sure, but i am guessing that is what replier prefers, given my comment is restored. I sort of am objecting to refactoring of my comments here, partly as I have noticed that done in another one or two AFDs, not sure whether by same editor or not. Refactoring / moving is a bit subjective, can have effect of dismissing/downrating a comment, or of clarifying, or of confusing discussion, or all of those. Here, I chose to put my original comment at end, deliberately, judging it was more important to show chronology clearly, while believing it was completely clear which preceding text my comment was addressing. Refactoring to put mine before someone else's redirect call seems to communicate differently, that their call was in agreement with nominator's exactly, which it was not. This is probably overkill to discuss more. It's just a subjective disagreement. But please do not refactor my comments in this AFD. -- do ncr  am  15:08, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
 * I was being bold. I stand by my movement of the comment because it was clearly intended as questioning my comment, thus it should be put below my comment.-- Laun  chba  ller  15:23, 10 August 2014 (UTC)