Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Joe cell

Krambambuli (talk) 13:38, 8 March 2009 (UTC)I have rewritten the article, taken out the nutso stuff and filled in as many sources as I could find on a short notice. Can this be reviewed please?

If still deemed too 'out there', please point out specifc points that need to be addressed.


 * Personally, I don't think it stands a chance, but if it gets speedy deleted and you really think it meets the inclusion criteria this time then you can request a wp:deletion review to overturn the decision. --DanielRigal (talk) 14:08, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Fair enough. I'm suprised that stuff gets censored here, even if it's talked about objectively. Shocked really. So much for open-source! Very close-minded openeness IMO Krambambuli (talk) 15:15, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I'd point out that subsequent to the edit above I (who speedied the article as a repost) pointed out the facts of life regarding WP:V, WP:RS, WP:SOAP and WP:OR to Krambambuli here. If not allowing every self-contradictory, undocumented, possibly made up piece of OR by conveniently-anonymous self-taught inventors of perpetual motion is censorship, then so be it. I have also suggested deletion review, but the author appears not to wish to go through that process. Tonywalton Talk 22:20, 8 March 2009 (UTC)