Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Joel Weiner

Moved from main page
(Note that this material has been moved here because it is not to do with the actual deletion discussion, nor with the conduct of the deletion discussion. It is simply sniping irrelevant to the main point or process.) ╟─ Treasury Tag ►  presiding officer  ─╢ 15:27, 22 April 2010 (UTC) (Agreed with above, argumentum ad hominem do not belong in the deletion discussion.) --A930913 (talk) 17:06, 22 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Can you stop hectoringn everyone, please, A930913? ╟─ Treasury Tag ►  co-prince  ─╢ 05:55, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I agree with Treasury Tag, the purpose of your account seems solely to defend this article, especially given your lack of edits anywhere else and your comments here: User_talk:Yehudi92.
 * That's it, apply derogatory terms to one who opposes your view. --A930913 (talk) 13:01, 21 April 2010 (UTC) — A930913 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * I don't see any derogatory terms being applied to any user in this discussion. I'm not sure what you are trying to achieve, but I would suggest a quick skim of WP:GOODFAITH might be useful. Fenix down (talk) 18:59, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Assuming the typo, "hectoring everyone" implies that I am bullying users here. --A930913 (talk) 20:45, 21 April 2010 (UTC) — A930913 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * No, it implies that you are hectoring everyone. Go read a dictionary. ╟─ Treasury Tag ►  without portfolio  ─╢ 20:57, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
 * "To behave like a bully" Wiktionary I stand to be corrected. --A930913 (talk) 22:49, 21 April 2010 (UTC) — A930913 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Hey, c'mon. Let's stick to the article.  Should Mr. Weiner be merged at all to the event articles?  This seems to be the only question left.  Can anybody make a good argument for this?  RJ (talk) 21:39, 21 April 2010 (UTC)