Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/John Blight (disambiguation)

Comment
It says: Disambiguation pages with only two entries

Some disambiguation pages with "(disambiguation)" in the title list only two meanings, one of them being the primary topic. In such cases, the disambiguation page is not strictly necessary, but is harmless. The recommended practice in these situations is to place a hatnote on the primary topic article to link directly to the secondary topic. The and  templates are useful.

If neither of the two meanings is primary, then a normal disambiguation page is used at the base name.
 * so why don't you do that, rather than deleting it? This sort of pettifogging will surely destroy WP eventually.

All the best  Vernon White  '''. . . Talk''' 15:24, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

One is primary, so it still meets the {db-disambig} reasons and MOS:DAB guidelines. JEB was not commonly known simply as 'John Blight', so it is unlikely someone would look for him there, but it gets less page views. This is cleaning-up, and removing completely redundant pages will not ruin WP. Boleyn3 (talk) 19:52, 5 November 2009 (UTC)