Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Jointness (second nomination)

The article about Jointness should not be completely deleted, rather, it should be summed up in fewer sentences. In the first nomination for its deletion, the sole reason it was nominated was because it was linked to three other entries all of which cited material by a single author and therefore deleted for orignial research. Jointness is a well known terminology used by many countries; it is definitely not original research or a Non-notable neologism. If you search the phrase on google, you will get thousands of entires. I do not understand how this material does not meet the relevant content criteria for Wikipedia and I do not think it needs to be completely deleted. --AvivaS 07:41, 18 July 2006 (UTC)