Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Julianity

I personally speak as a Julianite. As a new religious movement, is it not self-evident that there will be few sources that aren't self-published? And that these are not valid sources? As to the suggestion that Julianity is not a true and original belief system, does not the existence of followers of it represent its existence, and the roots of major religious movements in previous ones is well documented so I don't think you can say, just due to similarities and origins in major religions, that Julianism is not its own movement. 79.64.113.52 (talk) 13:15, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Speaking as one of the people closely involved in Julianity, I feel obliged to argue that this page is not deleted. It is only a small religious movement, and a lot of people criticize it, however, there are followers, and this is therefore a real faith. I feel that everything written on the page about the faith (obviously not its content) are facts. Therefore I think that it should not be deleted. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.5.99.172 (talk) 18:56, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

I am also a follower, and it most certainly is a real religious movement! I was not aware that there was also a facebook group, but I did not see that quoted as a source.? Don't delete! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.5.106.18 (talk) 17:59, 4 February 2008 (UTC)