Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Katarzyna Dolinska (4th nomination)

Speedy Close/Speedy Keep
This nomination was closed as Speedy Keep, as it was considered a bad faith nomination. Changing it to speedy close, without consulting the closing Administrator seems inappropriate to me. ... Misty Willows   talk  17:41, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * A bad faith nomination would be a Speedy Close, not a Speedy Keep. A Speedy Keep is only for AFDs with overwhelming Keep votes. And I *did* contact the closing admin. If he has a problem with it, he can correct it. You shouldn't restore misleading language here. Please revert your change. DreamGuy (talk) 17:47, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * when a AfD is closed it is maked as " The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.  "  If the closing Administrator agrees with you,  that the language is misleading, let him/her change it. It is not our place to modify a closed AfD.  ...  Misty Willows   talk  17:57, 15 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The AFD was terminated early for being an improper nomination. A re-nomination made the same day as a prior close should go to WP:DRV, not AFD_2.  The current AFD close status of the article is No Consensus.  MBisanz  talk 21:45, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * If you want it marked as a Speedy Keep, please indicate which part of Speedy keep applies, as none that I can see fit the circumstances at all. DreamGuy (talk) 23:19, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * See Speedy Keep 2.1 "vexatious nominations"  MBisanz  talk 23:44, 15 April 2009 (UTC)