Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Kayode Ajulo (2nd nomination)

Hi Celestina007, according to the WP:GNG, secondary independent and reliable sources which corroborate the article can be classified as reliable sources which give credence to the subject's notability hence giving the article a standalone ability. This was what I thought of when I set out to create this page as my first page by searching out independent references that would help the page sail. However, it would seem that is not enough. Armanoid (talk) 23:23, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
 * @, it might interest you to read or read GNG because it appears your premise is flawed. Celestina007 (talk) 23:40, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
 * @, this is part of the WP:GNG "A topic is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list when it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, "Significant coverage" addresses the topic directly and in detail, so that no original research is needed to extract the content. Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention, but it does not need to be the main topic of the source material". Based on this, it would appear that I am right. Armanoid (talk) 00:07, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
 * @, not quite. You are not right, how are you right when you do not understand GNG. All the sources used in the article are not considered reliable nor do they demonstrate their notability. Please see WP:RS & please show me what sources you say have covered them with WP:SIGCOV. I may not be replying to this any longer like I earlier stated you are going to get indef blocked as a promo only account if you continue down this path. Celestina007 (talk) 00:16, 5 July 2021 (UTC)