Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/KickassTorrents

Non-notable website/internet-service (fails WP:WEB: only claim to notability is Alexa ranking, no independent in-depth reporting). DMacks (talk) 05:12, 11 September 2012 (UTC) '''i am looking into that, shall be doing major edits and expansiions soon. ''' I had seen that IBTimes one (and the data/source it mentions), and it did not strike me as "in depth reporting"...mentions the site as one of many, and only specific comment about it is that it's the third most popular in its genre. The source it cites for that is a product roundup type that of article without much specific in-depth reporting, and the only basis for inclusion and ranking is the Alexa (or other) traffic ranking--high-traffic alone does not meet WP:WEB. I see no mention of the subject in the (google translation of) the Punto-Informatico item--stray/bogus google hit? The Neoteo one might be getting what we need. I think it's an actual detailed review of the site? Someone with good language skills please check it out for us. DMacks (talk) 13:00, 11 September 2012 (UTC) i believe that what you say is indeed very very true.it is third most popular,and i will provide the references and proofs after edits.i need 30 days' time,and i will make it a worthy wiki,so i promise.