Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Klerck

If you have come here seeking information on who klerck was, you shall not find it because Wikipedia censors information. Try this instead: []--Fragasm 18:43, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

59,999 Hits on google for "Two Towers Petition". How is that not worth having an entry for? --jidar

You may delete him from the internet, but you can never delete him from our hearts. He was my friend and a legendary troll.-- Fragasm 17:18, 8 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Please place this comment on the main deletion page: Articles for deletion/Klerck. I'd also like to point out that Wikipedia is not a memorial service.  Happy editing! :) Srose  (talk)  17:23, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

I'd love to Srose, but unfortunately that page says DO NOT EDIT in big nasty bold letters. I don't want to be deleted like klerck was so I am attempting to do this without stepping on the toes of the Wikipedia gods.--Fragasm 17:59, 8 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Actually, this debate has been closed for over a year. If you feel strongly about the article, however, you may be able to open a deletion review (see WP:AfD for instructions).  Sorry about that! Srose  (talk)  17:26, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

Bring klerck back
Bring klerck back —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.222.209.7 (talk • contribs) 17:59, 8 August 2006 (UTC).
 * True. Even now, I do not understand why this article was deleted. -- S iva1979 Talk to me  18:11, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

I agree here, this was the work of a rogue admin it seems, since the majority seemed to say keep here. If anyone has the article, I'd try to put it back up. Klichka 05:35, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

The result of the vote was KEEP, and the content of the article was all true
Bring back the KLERCK article.

Another poster for Klerck
I'm not exactly a fan of trolling or such behaviour, but I fail to see anything that was incorrect in this Klerck article. I find the article to have been valid content and worthy of a position here on Wikipedia, respectfully more so than several of Wikipedia's user pages. Klerck may not matter to many as a "subject of study", but obscurity is no excuse to expunge something from the history books.