Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Knightsbridge University

Uppland, please read
I respectfully ask you to delete the comment referring to Kennedy-Western University being a diploma mill. Kennedy-Western has filed suite with the State of Oregon and according to this suite it may not be referred to as such. The United States government now recognizes KWU as an "Unaccredited University". You say that a VfD page should not be reedited but I strongly disagree when such a page is being used as an example and can be viewed by the general public. Since this is an incorrect I ask you to revise these comments. Piercetp


 * I have replied on my talkpage. u p p l a n d 10:21, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

Read and acknowledged. One suggestion: could we put a POV statement here?Piercetp


 * I don't feel authorized to say. Discussion pages are all about POV, so I would assume that to be somewhat redundant and perhaps a dangerous precedent. But why don't you ask at the Village pump (policy) page? u p p l a n d 13:57, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

Thank you. I will do that. Piercetp

One additional statement: The Project page is "closed for discussion" so no further information can be added. When a provocative statement is made on such a page it means that the user who disagrees with that statemnet is unable to change it and the statement is forced to remain "written in stone". In other words, the project page is not a "discussion Page" but an ediface which cannot be changed. This is why a POV statement is needed. Piercetp