Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/LUElinks

Vote spamming
For the record...I do believe that LUELinks would vote spam in order to save this from deletion...I'm fairly certain that's where the last 3 keep votes came from. I think the closing admin should pay careful attention to the edit histories. Toffile 00:11, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Firstly why would we vote spam? Why don't need to advertise a private board, what would be the point? The site makes it income from donations from its members. Secondly you assume because someone voted keep that they must be from LUELinks, which is rediculous, why have the vote at all if you are going to question any keep votes? You also assume that anyone who makes edits somehow has greater right to vote than someone who is 'merely' a reader of the Wikipedia. The only people who care about this article are the 10 people who voted to delete it, and this is facted by the point that only now is this article even coming to our attention almost a year later and we certainly won't be partitioning for any reinstatement. The deletition is rediculous though, some people might want to know something about the site and why it is private etc. It seems that the people who want it deleted mainly have sour grapes because they are not a member, as most of them are in some way releated to Gamefaqs and not LUE included.

Also

I think the complete deletion of the LUElinks article is ridiculous....

Who gives a shit? Just let the fucking article stay. -- Dr. Casey I don't see why this needs to keep being deleted and protected, you're making too big a deal outof this. --Charitwo 10:20, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

You have no idea what your talking about, none of you have accounts or any knowledge of the subject. Luelinks is a joke. Any accounts still active have logins and passwords that simply reveal a blank page. And you ask how do i know this? I have an account. Who is telling you people this? (Metalmoses 02:06, 29 August 2007 (UTC))

What are you talking about, LUElinks does not exist. It is an ongoing joke. Klosterdev —Preceding signed but undated comment was added at 01:05, 16 September 2007 (UTC)