Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Leatherface (film)

These portions from the AFD discussion are being BIOLDLY transcribed to the talk page because they do not deal with the film discussion in any manner.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 21:05, 7 June 2015 (UTC)


 * < not related to AFD discussion >


 * No need to continually use that distracting green text as if I (or others) were unable to read or understand what you write. (me)
 * I used the green text because that’s how talk quotation is designed. I used talk quotation because I was quoting you on a Talk page. Feel free to propose changes on Template talk:Talk quotation; I’m not too keen on the color, either. But blaming me for it is like blaming me for the color of wikilinks in my post. —174.141.182.82 (talk) 20:16, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
 * No need to propose changes for a fine template when it is unfortunately being misused by anyone, as it is not the template's fault. And while perhaps not a big deal to some, it is distracting. More, the talk quotation page tells us "Use this template for inline quotations (of other editors' comments or from the article) on talk pages" (my emphasis), so you might feel free and welcome to use it on this particular discussion's talk page if sidebars are started there... but please, this AFD discussion page is not the "talk page", and per WP:AFDFORMAT the use of talk quotation and color is not listed as what is recommended for commenting or responding at AFDs. Thanks.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 21:39, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
 * You’re right, I misspoke; I meant I was quoting you on a discussion page. I’m afraid I can find no mention of formatting or coloring on the linked page, and I note that you used unconventional formatting yourself in this last comment. (Incidentally, wikilinks are also not listed as what is recommended, and they are clearly not discouraged.) And as this has gone off topic, might I recommend that any further replies be taken to our own Talk pages? —174.141.182.82 (talk) 22:21, 5 June 2015 (UTC)