Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Leuricy

Before we hastily decide to delete this entry, I would like to suggest that Shakespeare and many others were wordsmiths. Language is highly mutable, and my father (an aged autocrat of the English language) would be appalled to really know of all of the colloquialisms that have gotten into the dictionary. Of course, these are words that have seaped into the language over decades, and one might think here of the creationists who want simply to have their 'theories' taught in secular institutions without adequate sanction and scrutiny from the science community. And so maybe this word should be given time for absorption into the culture before deeming it a word. I do think the students at the Colorado Springs School should be commended, and their efforts at understanding a thinker have obviously been a great learning experience for them. Not enough youths today think about the words they use and put their minds to critical examination in this way. 97.112.157.184 (talk) 20:49, 28 September 2008 (UTC)Dewey Dell
 * How about we wait until it becomes notable, then we can make an article?--CyberGhostface (talk) 21:03, 28 September 2008 (UTC)