Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Lewis Chambers

Well, I see that all the participants have been emailed by the subject of this AfD, who has met harassment and embarrassment through the discussion.

While I believe that full deletion is out of the question, could this AfD be noindexed? → Σ  τ  c. 00:28, 30 April 2012 (UTC)


 * __NOINDEX__ is already on the page. GB fan 00:33, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I thought it had been removed when Nyttend had restored the discussion... → Σ  τ  c . 01:39, 30 April 2012 (UTC)


 * I won't object to deleting this page (per the edit summary here). ErikHaugen (talk &#124; contribs) 04:52, 30 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Editors might need to see this AfD if they are considering to recreate this title, and that is why I would prefer that the page is not deleted. Could it be courtesy blanked and full-protected, instead? → Σ  τ  c . 05:46, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I have privacy-blanked the page, which automatically NOINDEXes it. None of the various speedy-deletion requests supplied a valid reason, and there are important reasons to preserve the record of these debates. JohnCD (talk) 17:49, 7 May 2012 (UTC)