Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Lila Rajiva (2nd nomination)


 * I'd like to see the rule which says that I should mention that. Besides, anyone can see that the article is being nominated for a second time. Please WP:AGF--Strothra 02:19, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
 * I don't know if there is a rule, but it is standard practice- and no one on this page can see that this article has been renominated. I'm sure you will agree that there is little utility in endlessly debating the same articles. -- JJay 02:48, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
 * I'm not debating it. I am willing to discuss the AfD because, afterall, this is a discussion. But all users who come to this page see that it has been renominated because they see the large article title at the top which reads: "Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lila Rajiva (2nd nomination)" The 2nd nomination part is clearly visable to all users who come to this AfD discussion.  It is also clearly visable in the AfD tag on the main page of the article which tells the users it is a 2nd nomination.  All users should read the article before they discuss it in the AfD discussion.  There's absolutely no point in me stating that it's a second nomination.  It would be simply redundant and silly. --Strothra 02:54, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, in that case, I guess you should continue not to link to earlier AfD discussions such as Articles for deletion/Lila Rajiva. Nor should you attempt any explanation for why it was massively kept on AfD not so long ago, or why we should ignore the earlier debate (effectively thumbing our noses at all those previous participants). Meanwhile, I will continue to indulge my silly, redundant habit of pointing out those sorts of pointless links every time. -- JJay 03:07, 29 May 2006 (UTC)