Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Linguistic meaning


 * I am not disputing the decision, just saying that from the point of view of bona fide academic response, Wikipedia moves very quickly. Further, I don't see any consensus here - how is it actually decided that there's consensus?  I may be completely wrong (as this discussion is confused and opaque to me) how does linguistics end up with "meaning"?  Is there a disambiguation article proposed?  I'm so confused.  Unconfuse me.  --Levalley (talk) 03:15, 1 April 2009 (UTC)LeValley