Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/List of Catholic leaders and politicians

Deleted. OK, well it would seem obvious to me that this article was deleted under prejudice circumstances. Many do believe this article was important. Especially considering the history of Catholicism and Politics abroad. Many fascist leaders and dictators were Catholic and very dear to the Vatican hierarchy. The article was of interest and I have read that the Vatican and the CIA (created by a Catholic Knight of Malta) have been editing and vandalizing Wikipedia articles. Was this a form of vandalizing of a wikipedia article? Was this a mob rule decision to delete it? I used this article myself in a very important way. To fight antisemitism. because I had to use this article to 'fight back' against people who say Israel rules America when there was more than twice as many Catholic politicians than Jewish.


 * Tlthe5th, I don't understand why you assume prejudice. Please explain.  All the arguments in support of deletion were based on prescribed policy and guidelines.  Most of the arguments against deletion, like yours, were along the line of, "I find it useful or intersting".  I can't imagine many of those windmills actually tilting when you compare the Wikipedia lists of Jewish and Catholic leaders.  You must realize you're using a logical fallacy against a conspiracy theory.  It's a logical fallacy because it presumes that a minority could not manipulate and assert control from behind the scenes.  What's more, the statistics you're attempting to use are to an unknown degree, incomplete and subject to, probably unequal, bias.  Believers of conspiracy theories are often not susceptible to such things as facts, even when you really do have them.  I suggest you maintain your own list of interesting facts to battle antisemitism, because that's not the purpose of Wikipedia.  p.s. I especially love that part about the CIA vandalizing Wikipedia. --JJLatWiki 21:10, 27 August 2007 (UTC)