Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/List of Kid Nation participants

Lousy formatting
VP, please stop reverting to your lousy formatting, if you cant be bothered to fix your lousy formatting don't edit at this piece at all, our customers deserve some respect. Thanks, SqueakBox 21:01, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Kinda demeaning, your comments. You seem to object to the content under the guise of objecting to the formatting. That's kinda sad. VigilancePrime (talk) 21:02, 15 February 2008 (UTC)


 * I would sum up your comments as trolling, but what is new. Plus you have violated 3rr in order to promote your trolling and you should be blocked for it. Thanks, SqueakBox 21:15, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

55
Is there a specific reason for adding in 55 line breaks? If somehow your browser does not display properly, perhaps adding a instead would solve your problem. When viewed in normal screen size, it looks fine. Maybe that's why you feel it's poor formatting; your browser may be mis-displaying. VigilancePrime (talk) 21:12, 15 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Yes, i am trying to get rid of the ugly horizontal scrollbar where you scroll down a blank page, your foramtting is lousy and your refusal to fix it is typical of your arrogant behaviour. The customers come first. Thanks, SqueakBox 21:14, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I take exception to your factual inaccurate statement above. The problem is obviously your browser, and I have noted about the problem and solution. All you can do is yell and whine and make your silly personal attacks. The average observer would probably call that pathetic. And please do not edit my Talk page... per your request I do not edit yours, but you still cannot seem to give me the same respect... THAT "is typical of your arrogant behaviour", Squeaky. VigilancePrime (talk) 21:17, 15 February 2008 (UTC)


 * You have no idea what browser I am using but I would suggest claiming IE and Mozilla are the wrong browsers will get you nowhere, just typical VP trolling, if I was malicious I would say keep going but I dont care about you, I care about the project. Thanks, SqueakBox 21:20, 15 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Squeakbox, maybe if you had explained what you thought was wrong with the formatting then someone could have changed the formatting to make it look better. I personally didn't see anything wrong with the formatting and in fact I found it easier to read then the other comments left on the page. Maybe it was your browser like VP said or maybe it was your screen resolution that made it look different. But for you to remove the comments that Jack also wanted removed but saying it's for "formatting" reasons looks a little suspicious considering the fact that you two are known for having similar beliefs. For An Angel (talk) 21:25, 15 February 2008 (UTC)


 * And actually, Squeak, you have mentioned your browser choices before. Typical factual errors on your part. Please be civil... these personal attacks and violation of your agreements to leave me and my userpages alone only solidifies the evidence that you are an intentionally disruptive user. If that is the case, fine. If that is not the case, you need to not act like it. VigilancePrime (talk) 21:31, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I have never met an editor who attacks more than you, VP, and this is just typical. Thanks, SqueakBox 21:36, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
 * And I am still waiting for proof of my name-calling. You and Pol (oh wait!) still cannot prove your allegations. You seem to forget your own agreement to "live and let live". VigilancePrime (talk) 21:41, 15 February 2008 (UTC)