Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/List of PNAC Members associated with the Administration of George W. Bush

why?
From the article talk page:


 * it is only polemical insofar as the members of the interest group documented are associated with a specific political party in a basically two-party system. The way I see the article is as a cross-reference in relation to the members of perhaps an unprecedented, certainly the most conspicuous, connections between a private lobbying/interest/pressure group or think tank and an administration in the history of the USA. The public political process is becoming overly influenced by private interests, and this is a specific example that scholars are examining in detail, as per the sources.
 * At any rate, we've uncovered a wealth of sourcing and quotes for the PNAC article, regardless of the outcome of the AfD for the list article.

I proffer no opinion whatsoever on the propriety of the reasoning given, only present it as an example of the reasoning self-asserted by one editor. Collect (talk) 17:31, 17 March 2015 (UTC)