Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/List of Scheduled Castes

Moved from main page
This would screw up the log as it was...-- SarekOfVulcan (talk) 03:49, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

Close in process

Basically, see Deletion review if you wish to dispute the AFD close (Articles for deletion/List of Other Backward Classes). The nominator of this AFD doesn't like the decision of the previous multi-article AFD and disputes that the decision was Keep on both articles. The previous AFD was clearly about 2 articles, which was emphasized by the deletion nominator during the AFD. The closing statement was exactly: "The result was keep. Consensus is to KEEP with a promise of FIXING the issues noted." If you dispute the close, seek to re-open the just concluded AFD, or take it to Deletion Review to dispute the close, which also would perhaps reopen the AFD or would lead to a 2nd AFD. It is a waste of editors time to consider the same AFD from scratch. There is nothing different about the second of two articles in the multi-AFD, which is why no one commented.

My closing this is an invocation of IAR, I guess, as an involved editor should not close an AFD apparently. But neither should the deletion nominator unilaterally re-interpret the close of the just-concluded AFD. So I am requesting, elsewhere, that an administrator fully close this. -- do ncr  am  02:19, 25 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Where, pray tell, is this "elsewhere" where you are requesting an admin's attention? Regardless of that, as long as you are invoking consultation with uninvolved administrators, please recall that I consulted with the closing admin of the previous AfD before starting this one: User talk:Bwilkins. --Orlady(talk) 02:30, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
 * It is at wp:AN, where i name you, Orlady. So what if you chatted at Bwilkins Talk page.  Either you accept the previous AFD close which simply states "Keep", or you dispute it.  You don't get to re-open AFDs again and again.  You know this is a valid Wikipedia list-article topic.  You have nothing to add to your argument in the just-closed AFD.  I wish you would please find something else to do. -- do  ncr  am  02:42, 25 December 2012 (UTC)