Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/List of best-selling computer and video games

Note: The user Dionyseus has been arguing that it is unacceptable for the article to be unsourced because it is over a year old, implying that it "should have had a source by now". However, this is twisting the facts. It may have existed for over a year, but it only just became unsourced recently (and ever-so conveniently, Dionyseus has only chosen to blank the page when VGCharts' data was removed). - A Link to the Past (talk) 02:37, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Actually the one who's twisting facts is A Link to the Past. VGCharts was used as a source only recently.  Take a look at the article back in September of this year when it was also 99% unsourced: .  Let's go further back to December of 2005 when it was 99% unsourced: .  Dionyseus 03:27, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I suppose December 5, 2005 isn't just recently... but I suppose December 10, 2005 is though? And I scoff at your claims that I am twisting anything. There were no VGCharts links in the September version because they had been removed by me! I hope you will stop making false claims. - A Link to the Past (talk) 04:33, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
 * What exactly are you showing with the December 10 link? As for your October link, the version I linked was about 30 days prior to your version.  On September 9 2006 User:WhiteMinority sourced most of the article with VGCharts, which of course now we know it cannot be used.   Dionyseus 05:23, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
 * One - Check the Everything and Nothing link.
 * Two - And on August 8, 2006, I complained about VGCharts' usage.
 * Three -  If VGCharts was only "recently added", with you trying to act as if WhiteMinority just added it, why would it be there before the edit you cite? - A Link to the Past (talk) 05:53, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
 * What I meant was that the article wasn't heavily sourced by VGCharts until recently, I consider two months to be recent. Dionyseus 06:28, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
 * However, it can be assumed that the unsourced numbers were from EaN, just like the vast majority of the PS2 numbers were from there. The article had been progressively developed with sources and numbers since December 10, 2005. And they were just recently removed. You seem to imply that the article has been unsourced for an entire year. - A Link to the Past (talk) 06:56, 19 November 2006 (UTC)