Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/List of collections from Easton Press

I cannot believe this was deleted by Wikipedia. This is exactly what is wrong with this 'encyclopedia", and why it will always be a second class and suspect source of information. Now, I have no way of knowing what are the books on the 100 or the revised 125 list by Easton. Only the basement dwelling halfwit idiot editors on wikipedia would delete such a usefull and worthy entry. I give up. There is no fixing this mess. Thanks for nothing you morons.