Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/List of displays by pixel density

Unnamed section
It is my opinion that what has been done here is detrimental to Wikipedia. I would like to know what brought forward the attention of this article for deletion? --Mespinola (talk) 00:57, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) The "find sources" response is inadequate. If you follow that search phrase, the actual results are mostly uninformative and are no comparison to what had been compiled here.
 * 2) The bias accusation has no finding.  How can an article show bias if it is simply a known list of information? I don't not believe it is appropriate to call bias against a list of technical statistics. Every other Wikipedia article that compares anything would be subject to the same adjudication. This is not an appropriate precedent to set. Otherwise, this could appear that a party that does not like that they are negatively viewed in open comparison wants all visibility removed could have an agent attempt to do so under such Wikipedia "rules".  And unfortunately, this is the first thing that I assumed when I found the article deleted.
 * 3) Information lists similar to this are inline with any Encyclopedia goals, which are to list reference materials in alphabetical or numerical order. Many of the computer, networking, telecommunications, technology listings would be subject to the same policy - which again, would be detrimental to the knowledge accumulated and summarized in Wikipedia.


 * Hello there! Just to make sure, have you read all of the discussions linked in the deletion proposal?  Those should provide answers to the majority of your questions above. &mdash; Dsimic (talk | contribs) 04:06, 6 August 2014 (UTC)