Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/List of pornographic actors who appeared in mainstream films

Pointing to article
I'm reverting nominator AndyTheGrump's second attempt to bury a notice that the current version of the list under discussion is not the status-quo version. Blanking a page, then nominating the blanked page for deletion, is poor practice and creates a messy deletion discussion not based on the facts. Because community consensus runs against blanking the page in the first place, and against deleting the page at this point, it's probably fair to simply restore the page in question so that we may discuss it. However, I carefully put a brief notice and link here as the least contentious and most helpful way to point participants to the subject of our discussion here. I even moved the notice farther up to the top of the page to address his seemingly specious complaint that I was supposedly violating talk page guidelines by modifying his comment. I am not editing his comments at all, but rather adding a notice to the templated header area above his comments at the top of the discussion, something that is explicitly permitted at WP:TALK. For the record I will do this one more time but will not further join any process games he wishes to play. Others are welcome to chime in, though, or else we can resurrect the AN/I thread (where he also edit warred with multiple editors over section headings). - Wikidemon (talk) 21:47, 5 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Nevermind, closed as keep! - Wikidemon (talk)


 * Stop stating things that are not true, Wikidemon. The page has never been blanked, certainly not by Andy and you cannot provide any diffs to prove the veracity of your allegations either. So please dont make them. Of course what happened is BLP violations were removed and the community cannot by consensus ignore BLP because BLP has been set up to defend an altogether different group of people, the living subjects we write about. Thinking a group of editors can have a consensus to ignore BLP policy requirements would take a change in the written policy and BLP polciy enforcement is by defenition not blanking a page, not that the page was blanked anyway. ♫ SqueakBox talk contribs 21:53, 6 August 2014 (UTC)


 * As the prime instigator of this latest WP:BATTLE you hardly any standing to start throwing around accusations against the good faith editors around here in order to defend your editing buddy's poor behavior, much less lying about the edit history. Here's your tag edit war along with ATG and here's ATG's deletion nomination of the article after blanking. If you really care about living people, as you claim, you would do well to start by stop pestering Wikipedia's community of editors. You two nearly got sanctioned for this stunt. As for your argument that you and ATG didn't do what you did because your personal interpretation of policy lets you get away with it, you can take that argument to block or ban appeal if it comes to it. I'm not buying it, and most others are not either. Incidentally, this page is closed out as you must know, the decision was to keep. - Wikidemon (talk) 22:36, 6 August 2014 (UTC)