Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/List of programs broadcast by Radio Philippines Network

Voting twice?


As nominator, your support for deletion is implicit - this is voting twice Vegetationlife (talk) 19:20, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Incorrect, a nominator can explicitly vote under the nomination. "Nominations imply a recommendation to delete the article unless the nominator specifically says otherwise....some nominators explicitly indicate their recommendation" If solid policy based argument discussions were being presented, you cannot assume that I would not have supported a vote of keep, or withdraw.--Hu12 (talk) 19:56, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Cool! You went to all the trouble of finding that policy for me! You didn't bother here: Articles_for_deletion/Comics_Bulletin&oldid=187062360 Vegetationlife (talk) 20:40, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Hey can I "vote" twice too? -- Howard  the   Duck  03:33, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Absolutely..--Hu12 (talk) 15:55, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Eh... don't be biased and AFD other articles as well? -- Howard  the   Duck  16:45, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Guys, please, this back-and-forth is not helpful to the debate. I know sometimes it is very difficult to not take these things personally, but I implore everyone to please relax. Cheers. — Satori Son 16:17, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Okay, pretty please? — Satori Son 16:51, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Raw count analysis

 * Keep
 * 1) Danngarcia
 * 2) Howard the Duck
 * 3) Jojit


 * Delete
 * 1) Srpnor
 * 2) Satori Son
 * 3) Hu12


 * Non-participatory
 * 1) Vegetationlife - comment
 * 2) David Eppstein - categorize
 * 3) User:SineBot - Signing comment
 * 4) Starczamora - comment

Rough consensus rationale
none

Delete arguments

 * per nom
 * rationale Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, Wikipedia articles are not Directories, directory entries or a electronic program guide
 * per WP:NOT and WP:LISTS. Long lists of unreferenced redlinks are unhelpful to our readers
 * rationale policy based
 * Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, Wikipedia articles are not Directories, directory entries or a electronic program guide
 * rationale Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, Wikipedia articles are not Directories, directory entries or a electronic program guide

Keep arguments

 * If you will delete this page, maybe you should also delete the list of programs for NBC, ABC and CBS and other major television networks.
 * rationale Wikipedia talk:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions ALLORNOTHING
 * This is a standard "List of programs broadcast by Foo"
 * rationale fails Lists
 * For the same reasons I gave in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of programs broadcast by National Broadcasting Network. .... "If we have list of programs broadcast by The WB then why not have a list of programs by NBN? Keep it if we have to keep other non-US/UK/Aus/CA/NZ lists"
 * rationale Wikipedia talk:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions ALLORNOTHING

Summary
The keep arguments were lacked solidly in policy and precedent. Ergo: the closing rational is flawed, "The result was keep, nothing really that stands out here which would warrants an article deletion such as WP:V or WP:OR issues. The WP:NOT criteria can be debated for years without results and it can be subjected to various interpretations, so the result has been defaulted to keep. "

WP:V or WP:OR played no role in this discussion. Applicable "policy" (WP:NOT} states Directories, directory entries, electronic program guide ...and use explicity as an example "a radio station...". This should have been relisted.--Hu12 (talk) 03:03, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

WP:DRV
Hey, if you still insist, you can bring this to WP:DRV. -- Howard  the   Duck  10:55, 13 February 2008 (UTC)