Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/List of tallest buildings in Sunny Isles Beach

I tried to !vote
EC'd with the close. I don't think it would have mattered, but since I put a fair amount of effort into researching my argument I'm going to paste it here for no one to look at.


 * Delete all. These articles need to meet LISTN. That means if "tallest buildings in [city]" has not been the subject of SIGCOV in multiple IRS sources it should not be a standalone, regardless of how high the buildings are or any other informal, non-GNG-based inclusion criterion. Most of the entries in these lists aren't even notable, which is another strike against LISTN. From what I've seen looking at the sourcing for the pages alleged to meet GNG, SIGCOV of the topic is lacking. The fact that a city is mentioned to have skyscrapers, or even that the presence of these skyscrapers is a mild curiosity, does not amount to SIGCOV. "Skyscrapers existing in Sunny Isles Beach" would be far better covered as part of a general "south Florida skyscrapers" article noting the trend observed in beachside communities rather than constructing arbitrary height cutoffs and flooding the refs with sources for particular buildings, primary/non-independent sources, databases, and unreliable UGS/SPS. The North Hudson list citations are also deficient, with the ones noted above being passing mentions, discussion of the buildings in the area in general, primary governmental releases, discussion of some luxury apartments that mention they are tall a few times, discussion of high-rise apartments without any indication that their height is unusual among high-rise apartments, first-person opinion pieces, etc. Sources noting the existence of skyscrapers in a location does not mean a list of the tallest ones is warranted! JoelleJay (talk) 23:52, 31 May 2023 (UTC)