Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/List of topics characterized as pseudoscience (3rd nomination)

Supplementary comments

 * I'd like to point out that literally none of the people who are arguing to keep this article have addressed the reasons I gave why this article should be deleted (except for Enric, in the last comment, and that only address my example, not the issue itself). I would like to remind editors that this AfD is not about whether you as an editor like this article; this AfD is about whether this page adds to or detracts from wikipedia's status and reputation as an encyclopedia.  I am arguing that (as it stands), this article adds little to the encyclopedia and takes away a lot - it's largely a dumping ground for skeptical disdain and innuendo.  Remember, decisions on wikipedia are not votes.  Please update your entries to include some explanation of why the stated reasons for deletion are incorrect; or if you can't, please refactor your comments so that the discussion of substantive issues can proceed without being interrupted by irrelevant 'yea' and 'nay' exclamations.  thanks. -- Ludwigs 2  14:33, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I expanded my comment a lot. Not sure if I addressed everything. --Enric Naval (talk) 20:30, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
 * What your reasons were or weren't aren't important. We've given reasons why it should be kept, and the meat of your argument had been debated on the article talk page. I see no policy reason for deleting this page. I ask you again (in case you missed it) to withdraw your nomination. I see no merit in the argument you advance above. This is a useful page and can be made better. Shouldn't this be on the talk page? Verbal   chat  14:56, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I have once seen an article deleted because nobody responded to what seemed to be the weakest argument offered by the nominator. See WP:Articles for deletion/Political violence in Spain since 1975. Therefore completely ignoring the nominator's rationale seems to be a potentially dangerous strategy. --Hans Adler (talk) 15:30, 16 April 2009 (UTC)