Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/List of traps in the Saw film series (3rd nomination)

AfD Analysis
Please add a new section if you wish to comment on this AfD itself or the closing of this AfD.

Valid Deletion Arguments

 * Fails WP:PLOT
 * WP:OR issues

Invalid Deletion Arguments

 * The article is badly written, deletion is never about how "badly written" the article is, never will be
 * The fact that SAW is "gory crap" has nothing to do with deletion policy and therefore it cannot be used as a grounds for deletion

Invalid Keep Arguments

 * Only articles that are "hopelessly beyond savage" should be deleted, as stated above, deletion is never about how "badly written" the article is, therefore there isn't really any validity in this argument
 * The content is useful
 * The article is a good article
 * The notability of Saw does not assert that the subject of this article is independently notable

Conclusion
There are two issues with this article, excessive plot summaries and original research, the latter one being the more vital issue at hand. These two issues were never addressed in the duration of the AfD. There are simply no reliable sources that assert the notability of this subject in an independent context. Therefore, this article will fall in to the category of original research, and the Wikipedia's policy of no original research is part of the five pillers which Wikipedia is based on. Therefore, the result of this AfD discussion is delete. Yamamoto Ichiro (talk) 01:49, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

While I am not happy to see it go, I am happy that you fully explained your reasonings as to why you deleted it, which was my main problem with the initial closure. I won't be contesting the deletion or restarting it for the forseeable future.--CyberGhostface (talk) 01:57, 19 October 2008 (UTC)