Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/List of unusual personal names (3rd nomination)

See also Votes for deletion/List of unusual personal names Fg2 (talk) 02:58, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

A note from a new user

I am only a noob to editing on wikipedia, but I see no reason this article should have been deleted. It was somewhat silly, but these kinds of silly articles are what help keep wikipedia the light-hearted community it is. How can we pretend to be "open" to changes if we decide to delete any instance of someone having fun? Let's restore the article and put the humor banner on top of it and call it a day. I'll be waiting to see what happens. Nameless9123 (talk) 02:57, 18 January 2009 (UTC)