Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Lititz Watch Technicum

Close
@Stifle, this doesn't particularly matter apart from purposes of future renomination, but I just want to note for the record that I think your reading is off. This looks like a consensus to keep and I would have expected it to be closed as such. Please be cautious in your AfD closes. &#123;{u&#124; Sdkb  }&#125;  talk 14:13, 1 September 2023 (UTC)


 * I agree with @Sdkb that the arguments to delete were based on the information available at the time, but when new sources were found, the editors aware of the new information formed a consensus to Keep. I always like to see editors change their minds when the facts change, but here, no one had the humility to strike their comments. Maybe next time. Cheers! BBQboffin (talk) 06:15, 12 September 2023 (UTC)