Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Lolcat

reconstitution
Someone's going to grouse that I changed this archive, so I need to explain myself. In my reconstitution, I replaced 's original deletion nomination, as well as restructured the discussion in chronological and discussional order. I made no other changes to the comments and input of the contributors, as verifiable in this diff. —  pd_THOR  undefined | 17:24, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
 * accidentally (?) removed the nomination reason when providing his or her input.
 * I delved into the discussion history to find what had been removed and why.
 * When I did, I found that many of the contributions to the discussion had been placed at the top of the page before prior contributions as opposed to at the bottom in continuous chronological order. Whether this was done on accident, or to lend credence to their input as opposed to those who came before them, I don't know.