Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Lowe Boats

How did this suddenly after nearly stagnating for days get three homogenous inputs in one morning. There is no evidence on the user's talk pages. I have manually notified relevant editors in the past but not to push them to a specific conclusion. Not saying that's what happened here but it is quite a strange coincidence. B137 (talk) 14:24, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
 * When one starts to question the good faith motivations of long time contributors, perhaps thinking coincidence was something more, that's dark territory to visit. For my part, and I was the last contributor, I was looking at AFD "Old Discussions", came across this one, and agreed with the assertions made by others. Nothing strange at all. All the content is still in page history if you want to merge anything over or rebuild with stronger sourcing. BusterD (talk) 16:09, 8 September 2015 (UTC)


 * No, I'm all for the redirect, I'm just unbiased to the point where I will counter my own motives when the end may not justify the means. If this was ranked high in a backlog then that explains the sudden traffic, so I see no foul play. B137 (talk) 16:50, 8 September 2015 (UTC)