Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Luka Rocco Magnotta

Discussion by anonymous editors/SPAs

 * The person who put this up for deletion had no right. This person has been harassing Luka Magnotta all over the internet. Just because you dont like mr. magnotta and dont agree with him does not give you the right to delte his page. This article should NOT be deleted. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.233.9.82 (talk) 03:34, 21 January 2008 (UTC)  — 99.233.9.82 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.


 * Keep Keep article. It is quite clear that all over youtube ONE person is spamming and trying to slander Mr. Magnotta;s name. He posted a message on Magnotta's wall that he had "deleted Luka's page of wikipedia"...the person also is boasting how he is going to bring harm to magnotta. OBVIOUSLY the person who nominated this page for deletion is the same person who is slandering around Luka's name. I agree with everyone to keep and lock to protect. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.13.92.39 (talk) 05:09, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

I agree with everyone above to keep page, simply because he is gay and a few individuals dont like him should not be any reason to delete this page, please keep thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.233.9.82 (talk) 02:55, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep User:amberrose331 Chris Crocker=youtube celebrity, William Sledd= Youtube celebrity, Luka is on youtube aswell and has over two million viewers to his channel. Also he is very popular in the male adult industry and the Canadian population. He is frequently featured in Canadian media and television. Keep the article please and thank you, everyone stop arguing and vandalising this page. *Note to admin Please keep page up, however edit name to just Luka Magnotta and exclude Rocco, as that is his middle name and noone searches "Rocco". Also please consider locking this page to prevent further attempts at vandalisium. It seems that on a daily basis this page is edited to cause problems by people who do not like Magnotta.
 * Striking multiple vote. JuJube (talk) 12:29, 22 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep Article is worthy of Wikipedia, It has numerous sited souces and Luka is noteable and known. Including reputable news articles and IMDB, official website, links to his films, I vote to keep this article and please people, stop being so childish and constantly writting negative and untrue material about Magnotta. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.191.152.98 (talk) 15:49, 22 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep I agree to keep this page, on the official Luka Magnotta youtube page there is a comment ..quote "Luka Magnotta will be deleted from youtube cause he is a fairy, I nominated him for deletion and he will hopefuly be gone soon"  So it is quite clear to all of us that a handfull of haters are vandalising luka's websites including this wikipedia entry. I agree with the above poster to please keep this page and lock it to prevent all the vandalisim. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.97.126.226 (talk • contribs) 2008-01-21 04:39:36


 * Keep this page should be kept, Mr. Magnotta is frequently featured in Canadian media, he is notable in alot of adult films which I have personally watched and he is extremely popular on youtube. There are individuals who do not like his profession so they post comments on his site "they will kill him" Please keep this page and lock it so there will be no more vandalisim...obviously alot of people are aware of him ...thats why they constanly vandalise his page. Please lock it and keep it. deletion is what the negative people want and thats the only reason they nominated it...  kind regards.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Imaginefreedom (talk • contribs) 03:45, 21 January 2008 (UTC)  — Imaginefreedom (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * KEEP This article is very useful and clearly states Mr. Magnotta's Webpage, News articles, IMDB page and others.. I googled Luka Magnotta and over ten thousand pages appeared...obviously the last person was not spelling his name correctly. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Imaginefreedom (talk • contribs) 04:02, 21 January 2008 (UTC)  — Imaginefreedom (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Your opinion is noted, but you may only make one recommendation to Keep or Delete. Thank you. UltraExactZZ Claims~ Evidence 13:40, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Just because some people dont like him doesnt mean they should be able to delete his wikipedia page. I mean look at Chris Crocker. People dont like him and they tried to delete his page and vandalise it every day. I searched the history of Luka's page and there was vandalisim on a weekly basis. My idea is to save his page and to please consider locking it. Thank You. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Imaginefreedom (talk • contribs) 2008-01-21 04:13:15 — Imaginefreedom (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Your opinion is noted, but you may only make one recommendation to Keep or Delete. Thank you. UltraExactZZ Claims~ Evidence 13:40, 21 January 2008 (UTC)


 * keep Someone on youtube is claiming they are going to delete magnotta from wikipedia. I have researched magnotta and he seems to be pretty popular in canada and on youtube and on xtube aswell as his myspace and in the canadian media. I dont know what the above person is talking about " 380 hits in google?" there are over 10,000 hits when I typed his name Luka Magnotta. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fireintheskyman2 (talk • contribs) 05:16, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
 * It's "Luka Rocco Magnotta" not "Luka Magnotta". All of you need to stop being so desperate and just leave the darn article and this page alone. If he doesn't meet notability, he doesn't meet notability. We're not being "mean" or "stupid" just because this is here. It doesn't mean we "hate him". Stop removing stuff too. This is really getting out of control. I'm putting the speedy delete tag up on the article again. ― LADY GALAXY 05:19, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Also, I find it hilarious everyone else who has commented here is either anonymous (on an IP) or on an account with a low edit count. This seems suspicious. Plus, they all seem to be saying the same things over and over. Nobody wants to sign their comments, either. I thought there was a rule only registered users could participate in such discussions? ― LADY GALAXY 05:21, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Anons can participate in AfDs, but their comments are typically not given the same consideration or weight. However, I agree that this seems like a bit of a laundry parade. LaMenta3 (talk) 06:15, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
 * From memory I think you can ask for semi-protections on AfDs if they are being spammed like this if it is still a problem you may want to ask --Sin Harvest (talk) 06:30, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Not quite. A good rationale based firmly upon our policies and guidelines is given the same weight whether it comes from an editor with an account or from and editor without an account.  And the same goes for a bad rationale that has no basis in, or that is counter to, our policies and guidelines.  Uncle G (talk) 12:13, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Comment: Keep page, millions have viewed his videos and ther is a fan page up on Xtube.com for him with ober 29,000 members. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Imaginefreedom (talk • contribs) 21:32, 23 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep I say simply leave the article up and alone. Many many people have found it useful including news media which is mentioned in the article. Its obvious this article should remain up and its also obvious that the vandalisim needs to stop. He is quite well known on the net and in movies, gay bashers just dont like him because he is gay. User:amberrose331

""" COMMENT""" You said " He was listed in FAB magazine under 2 different names" Yes one was Luka and the other was his stage name "Jimmy" His photo is up and it still states Luka at the bottom. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.191.220.195 (talk) 21:48, 24 January 2008 (UTC)