Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Luke Kelly-Clyne

While the dissenting opinion may be valid, the subject maintains an extensive collection of his own published work by a reputable news outlet--if there is no reliable third-party coverage on the subject then would not his work having been published and reviewed by other editors not stand to substantiate the subjects' notability? His personal work as a television producer is also noted and substantiated through IMDB: does that not qualify as a reputable source?

While I'm sure it appears that a paid contributor would have some kind of implicit bias in the proceedings of posting this simple bio page, why then is the option to disclose pay even allowed by Wikipedia at all? If my willingness to disclose my pay is itself the reason why I cannot contribute than what if any is my incentive for disclosing my pay? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pescobosa (talk • contribs)
 * I have moved this comment to the main discussion page. AfD talk pages are typically not used. Please see WP:AFDFORMAT for more information on how to participate. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 10:18, 21 December 2017 (UTC)