Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Luke Wijohn

A7 declination
Commenting here on the talk page since the proverbial ship has sailed and I don't like loose ends. Pinging all participants of the AfD for transparency's sake. In response to some concerns about my declination (or contestation since I'm not an administrator) of the CSD nomination, A7 is a very low bar; it states that the article When I removed the CSD nomination, I wasn't making a judgement on whether the subject was notable (though going off the result my gut reaction was right). For me, being a general election candidate was a reasonable credible claim of significance. That, coupled with the sourcing in the article (which gave it a reasonable claim to meeting the general notability guideline), didn't make it a clear-cut candidate for speedy deletion. I realise that I am repeating myself slightly from my edit summary, but just wanted to address the concerns raised in the AfD questioning why the article wasn't speedily deleted. Sdrqaz (talk) 22:11, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
 * It was so obvious that it wasn't a CSD candidate that I didn't even see the need to comment on that.  Schwede 66  23:00, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
 * @Schwede66: I've had a little more scrutiny on my CSD removals given it's a little more unusual for non-administrators to be keeping an eye on CAT:CSD, so didn't want to be accused of being non-responsive Speaking of pages that were obviously not CSD candidates... Sdrqaz (talk)  23:06, 6 September 2021 (UTC)