Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Lynotic

Hoax?
Google + Google Scholar both come up with nothing relevant for Lynotic, and nothing for the Lynotic book. Anyone find sources? --h2g2bob (talk) 14:20, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

I was searching for Prussian and now I've found this. Does this language really exist? I have never heard of it.

If you have no respect for my origin I cannot do anything against it. I let the fight is it was once. This page can be removed. If this encyclopedia doesn't want to have reality I don't have a problem with it. I'll stop editing Wikipedia. --Janvanhorn 13:44, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

I have already expected this to happen. If you cannot share information on Wikipedia the free encyclopedia is no real free encyclopedia. 4512980355a 13:52, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

I have made this article so it could help starting more interest in this language. Lynotic is almost death. The only way to save the language is by putting it on Wikipedia. I wasn't interested in Wikipedia so I let 4512980355a] edit this page.[User:84.28.2.108|84.28.2.108 14:02, 14 June 2007 (UTC)


 * If "the only way to save the language is by putting it on Wikipedia," then you've come to the wrong place. Anonymous or pseudonymous Wikipedia editors cannot be, for obvious reasons, reliable sources. If Wikipedia were to allow original research by Wikipedia editors, Wikipedia wouldn't have an informative encyclopedia; it would be a misinformative blogopedia. For this reason, Wikipedia is not the place to publish things that have not been published elsewhere. If you want to publish things on this language, then do so outside of Wikipedia. If it's published in reputable sources, then those sources can be used to introduce content into Wikipedia that passes Wikipedia's core policies (verifiability, neutral point of view, no original research). Pan Dan 14:13, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
 * If I find a external link to Lynotic would that be enough to put this article again on Wikipedia? --Janvanhorn 15:33, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
 * If you have an external link to a reliable, published source that discusses this language, then that would be a good start. (More than one source would be even better.) Pan Dan 16:04, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

I have done some research and lynotic is just anotre name for West Frisian not for a slavic language. Maybe a redirect to West Frisian? --Arjanv 17:43, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Sources, please. What are the sources that indicate that Lynotic is another name for West Frisian? Pan Dan 17:54, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I mailed User:Janvanhorn to ask what Ǣres means. He said it means West. I remember he once said that Ǣres Lynotic somekind of frisian language was. I know it isn't a reliable source but it's more than this article now.--Arjanv 18:08, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I didn't sais Aeres Lynotic, I said Aeres Frysk Janvanhorn 18:12, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
 * AEres msn community --Janvanhorn 18:15, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Ookwel AEres linotieks? Translated: aka AEres lynotic. Danke... --Arjanv 18:16, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
 * A reliable source, please. An MSN chatroom is not a reliable source. Pan Dan 18:27, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I know doch Janvanhorn seemly not... --Arjanv 16:58, 18 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Janvanhorn praat voortaan Engels of Nederlands dat kun je tenminste! --Arjanv 17:40, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Hebben we dit onderwerp niet al besproken op mijn overlegpagina? ;-) --Janvanhorn 17:42, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Hey, instead of always using google (as it is a US based search engine), try a European based search engine like Exalead which is based in France and I often use it to search for information when ever I'm doing an assignment for a French-language course. Nat Tang talk to me! 21:12, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Luûr aober Arjanv. --Janvanhorn 11:08, 19 June 2007 (UTC)