Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/M&M Desexualization Controversy

Frivolous Nomination
Fram created a Proposal for Deletion for this article a few days earlier. The proposal was then deleted, with the edit note addressing why I thought the article ought to remain. Instead of addressing what I wrote, Fram decided to simply copy-and-paste what he wrote in his Proposal for Deletion and try to get the article deleted through a different process. I don't know whether Fram is just rushing through this issue or if he thinks the nomination will default to him based on his clout here, but in any case it seems quite clear that reasoning behind the Nomination is not being considered thoroughly nor does it factor in the points I made earlier about why it ought to stay. User:MangaMaster21 (talk) 08:54, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Unless you mean something else I have missed, I think you refer to your edit summary when removing the ProD: "Proposition for deletion seems frivolous, unconstructive, and contrary to the goal of housing and sharing information." I don't see what in there needs to be addressed, or how this is an answer to the issue of WP:NOTNEWS. It would be best if you tried to make your case about why this article needs to be kept at the AfD (without attacking me or other people). Fram (talk) 09:34, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
 * User:MangaMaster21, you should be making your argument on the AFD page, not the talk page, which no one looks at. Liz Read! Talk! 03:38, 8 February 2022 (UTC)