Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Majestic Tree Hound

Followup note, for future reference
The way to deal with this in the future is simple. We certainly do not need this article, since it's a miserable stub and will almost certainly remain one, and new-breed attempts like this most often result in extinction within a decade, meanwhile most of the sourcing is not truly reliable (dog fancier publications are largely written by breeders and serve a promotional purpose).

The fix is an article like List of dog crossbreeds and List of experimental cat breeds (yes, they could use more consistent naming). Just a couple of months ago, we AfDed to merge an iffy cat article into the latter of those list articles, and the same can be done with iffy dog articles like this one into the former. We could quite literally end up with 100+ crap "articles" like this if we don't take this approach (and we already have dozens of potential merge candidates), because backyard breeders are trying to create new breeds all the time, and if they look funny or whatever, someone somewhere (probably with a connection to one or more breeders) will write about them somewhere and lend a false sense of notability.

Maybe this Majestic Tree Hound page passes the GNG, by a [dog] hair, but the project is better served by compressing info on wanna-be breeds like this into a list article. PS: We also have List of extinct dog breeds and a bunch of junk stubs should merge to that, too. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  11:18, 21 February 2018 (UTC)