Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Maladaptive daydreaming

Hey. Just wanted to chime in and say a couple things in defendence of this article. Many psychological terms that could be characterized as popular science do have their own pages, such as "Codependency". I think that academic acceptance is not the only criterion of importance for a psychology-related article. The questionable nature of the term can be actively discussed in the article. Maladaptive Daydreaming has had a lot of media attention, and there are online forums with many users who claim to have it. So it could also be seen as interesting as a phenomenom of societal interest, similarly to "Tulpa", which, as far as I know, isn't a well-established psychological phenomenom within the academic community either. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kivuli (talk • contribs) 18:02, 9 October 2017 (UTC)