Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Maram Susli

Comments by an editor after the discussion was closed
Because User:Wootendw has twice made out-of-process comments on this closed AfD page, I have EC protected the page, posted those comments here, warned the contributor against making the same error again, and linked DRV for them in case the user feels a compelling need to have my closure reviewed. BusterD (talk) 18:14, 13 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete Those in favor of 'keep' are those who have acted to defame the subject and, whenever possible, to reject edits that defend/counter those defamations. Including the edit history, more has been written on the subject in this Wikipedia 'biography' than has been written in all serious and citable references to the subjects. This article has been, and continues to be, a poorly written hodgepodge of defamations to the subject. The article is unhelpful to the broad readership of Wikipedia in assessing the veracity of the subject's posts on social media. The article is a disgrace and, ought to be, an embarrassment to Wikipedia. (Unsigned by Wootendw (talk) 03:02, November 12, 2022‎)


 * This is a personal attack on other editors ("sock puppet or troll faction"). Refrain from personal attacks. Wootendw (talk) 17:16, 13 November 2022 (UTC)


 * "on the same day. Two said comments seven minutes apart." This article has been repeatedly edited for years, often several times a day. Wootendw (talk) 17:30, 13 November 2022 (UTC)


 * You state "Each have no user page, just talk pages with little or nothing but automated new-user information placed by Wikipedia bots". On your Wikipedia user profile page, you say in large font "You know you have been on Wikipedia for too long when". Have you looked into the latter as it pertains to yourself? Over 500 contributions, many of which are probably deletions of other editors' contributions. Wootendw (talk) 17:40, 13 November 2022 (UTC)

BusterD (talk) 18:14, 13 November 2022 (UTC)