Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Martin D. Weiss (2nd nomination)


 * Neutral As it stands the sentence is backed by reliable sources and the subject does appear to have coverage in more than one secondary source with editorial oversight. Is the coverage significant? Can it be when the article is so short? I wouldn't want to argue that conundrum. I think if the article can be expanded, with further quality sources then there shouldn't be any reasonable argument to delete. However, as it stands at the moment, albeit just within WP:GNG, as a one sentence paragraph it doesn't seem inherently useful for an encyclopedia. isfutile:P (talk) 23:04, 10 May 2012 (UTC)