Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Meganekko

Adding comment from discussion that was written prior to closing but couldn't be posted before due to the edit conflict stemming from the admin's close:


 * The Perfect Article test applies here. If it can be reasonably posited that sources can be found with effort to the point that WP:V is passed, then the article only needs to be improved, not deleted. I've already posited two places said sources can be found, all that's left is the footwork. This argument has been used to the justify the retention of other Wiki articles that were created with sloppy citations, so there's precedence for keeping on this basis. Buspar (talk) 04:09, 15 September 2008 (UTC)