Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Michael W. Dean

Yeah, I do assume bad faith, Kindzmarauli. But it's not without merit. Especially since after I snipped at you for destroying my work, ***you searched out every article I've ever started and tagged 'em all for deletion!***

And also the fact that you've pressed for NOT deleting other articles tagged for deletion simply because you have a *personal interest* in the subject. ("Dixie Truckers Home", for instance).

You say "Red wine makes the world go round, but only after 7-8 glasses." Do you get drunk when editing? I think it clouds your judgment. Why don't you drink some more, delete more of my work, then tell me which pages you're NOT going to delete. That would be easier.

So this all started because I reported vandalism on a page? Kind of reminds me of what people say is why the Arizona immigration law is bad, "It will keep people from reporting real crimes for fear of retribution." ElizaBarrington (talk) 07:35, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
 * I have placed a note on your talk page warning you about making personal attacks. Please stop. The articles you created have been submitted for AfD because the subjects do not merit inclusion. AfD is a discussion, so if you would like them to be kept, I suggest you attept to provide independent third-party sources to establish notability instead of attacking me personally. I have not "destroyed your work". Your work does not meet the guidelines. Franky, I suspect you have more than a passing connection to this Michael Dean person considering how determined you are to initiate full protection of his biography every time an IP vandal adds some nonsense to it, and how personally you are taking these completely reasonable attempts to determine if these articles actually merit inclusion. Kindzmarauli (talk) 17:47, 17 August 2010 (UTC)