Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Mike Magee (journalist) (2nd)

W00t! First Post!!

Mike, don't worry about the delete, I'll buy you, Adam and Eva a beer. :)

Have a good week, cheers!

86.141.195.213 12:05, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

This is all because the Inquirer managed to make Wikipedia look like a bunch of tossers in a series of stories. Mike Magee is an IT industry icon and known through-out the world. The fact that Wikipedia editors have made a consistent series of attacks on him is indicative that this is NOTHING about whether he should be included or not. It is just that Wikipedia does not like it up 'em. With such petty vindictiveness they just go to show that they are not actually interested informing any one about anything that does not offend their petty little worlds. The INQ is read by a few million a day and is one of the more popular online IT magazines. Other editors with much smaller circulations are listed. Mike's previous magazines were well established rags like Computing and VNU. He was counted as one of the top 100 UK contributors in 10 years of the Internet by e-consultancy. If you remove everything that has an unattributed comment then you will have to delete half the encyclopedia. In short the entry needs expanding not deleting. If you want I will write one for you.

Article restored for discussion/improvement
The deleting admin has, after discussion on their talk page User_talk:W.marsh, restored the article to user space to allow it to be worked upon. Anyone wanting to work on the page as it was can do so at User:Citizensmith/Mike Magee (journalist). Citizensmith 14:19, 18 June 2007 (UTC)