Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Miniscule of Sound

I dont understand why you are trying to delete the wikipedia entry for Miniscule Of Sound? As an interactive piece ov performance art and installation it is most certainly of note. As a music venue alone it is of further note. It has been imitated and plagiarised around the world because of its popularity and originality and unique qualities but it is the original version of the Worlds Smallest Nightclub idea and a can still be found in operation on a regular basis which cannot be said for its (often poor) imitators. . It has, as mentioned, been pushed from the current Guinness Book Of Records for the moment but the replacement entry really doesnt operate with the longevity and consistency of the actual Miniscule and was of course purely conceived as a copy of the smallest nightclub idea in the first place. I spoke with the editor of GBR and he said the Miniscule club would be re-listed in the future. The Miniscule has been taken to China by The British Council to represent innovation in British culture and design, it has been filmed by the BBC and featured in broadcast and print media around the world from TV and Radio to being used in theatrical performance (Keith Allen & Damian Hirst) to coffeee table books (worlds best bars etc) , It regularly appears as a feature of prestige arts events such as Fuji Rock festival in Japan and Glastonbury Festival in UK among numerous other events, it is listed regularly as one of the worlds top 10 unique nightspots, it has also turned down offers of appearing in the U.S., Singapore, New Zealand and a heap ov other places, it was originally devised as an artistic installation in London Fields Lido while it was a squatted site and relates therefore to the architecture and history of recent east london especially with its recent gentrification and changes, it was used at the D and AD awards because of its relevence, it has featured on the Guinness book of records TV show in the UK, it has had numerous well known guests and DJ's, its very popular unique and fun! - it seems pretty petty to try and remove it because it is not of cultural relevance to yourself, surely the site should be about finding information about things you dont already know about. . .  If TokyoGirl would like to see who and what The Miniscule Of Sound actually is then feel free to visit at Fuji Rock Festival 2014 in her home nation of Japan where the club and artists involved will be flown to and employed once again at the expense of the promoters in July this year for around the 5th consecutive year, a point ov noteworthyness in itself.

It is one of a kind apart from people who have copied the idea from The Miniscules popularity and all that jazz .. ..

So i obviously VOTE TO KEEP THE ENTRY for Miniscule Of Sound - please put the entry back to the way it was, thanks. Kevmaru (talk) 13:22, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

removing the Wikipedia entry on the Miniscule of Sound because it is found to be a promotional entry is not a reasonable argument given the Ministry of Sound (a $100 million business) is permissible. If there is doubt on the veracity of the Guinness claim this can be addressed in edits. AnderAV (talk)AnderAV — Preceding undated comment added 15:12, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

I am working on a rewrite of the article. I'd welcome pointers in what makes a performance art/ theatre group notable enough to be in wikipedia: ideas for categories of content I need to include welcomed. Is it based upon achieving a certain volume of referencing in other media articles? Longevity? awards? Do we need to define the nature of the performance piece? information welcomed. Kind regards mgaved (talk) 13:39, 9 June 2014 (UTC)