Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Monster Pig

There has been expert photography analyst that have provided serious doubts as to the pig being actually near as large as portrayed. It should be deleted or noted as possible hoax. Besides the expert analysis, the Stone's story doesn't add up as it is continually changed with different interviews. The image of the hog being pulled out by the tractor is obvious enough IMO that the pig isn't 10 feet long or near that.--TheCPE 21:17, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
 * If there are sources to back up this claim, it's a matter for the article talk page, not here. Friday (talk) 05:13, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Trolling
WTF? I see at least three different trolling keeps in this nomination:, ,. Someone care to explain? The Evil Spartan 00:09, 1 June 2007 (UTC)


 * In the end, some administrator will look at the comments and may, for instance, come to the conclusion that WP:PIG can not be used as the basis for a decision, as it has not yet reached consensus as policy within the Wikipedia community. Nobody is likely to be hurt or upset by such a decision. Meanwhile, it might be more useful for you to look for "trolling" in debates about infected political or religious subjects. Pharamond 06:52, 1 June 2007 (UTC)


 * You may also wish to investigate "humor". No pigs were harmed in producing this Public Service Announcement. KillerChihuahua?!? 15:26, 1 June 2007 (UTC)


 * My keep was a trolling keep as well. I'll adjust it accordingly. The Land 16:05, 1 June 2007 (UTC)